OLD INDIAN CREEDS CHAP. II 25 ascetics; he converted the solitary 'Dandi', with his staff and waterpot, into one of an order, a monk or friar, at once coenobitic and mendicant, who lived upon alms and who practised chastity.^ The order was rendered still further distinct by the choice of Siva as the truest Ramanuj type of God, an example which was soon followed; and, establishes during the eleventh century, Ramanuj fraternity of Brahmans, named after established a other orders. himself, who ^"Jj^^ ^^ adopted some refined rules of conduct, who saw the ^^^^^^^^y Deity in Vishnu, and who degraded the Supreme Being go^, a. d. by attributing to him form and qualities.- A conse- 1000-1200. of many people in India, particularly the Bhagat Mala (or History of the Saints) and its epitomes; but the advantage is great of being able to study the subject with the aid of the notes of a deep scholar personally acquainted with the country. It is only to be regretted that Professor Wilson has not attempted to trace the progress of opinion or reform among sectaries; but neither does such a project appear to have occurred to Mr. Ward, in his elaborate and valuable but piecemeal volumes on the Hindus. Muhsin Fani, who wrote the Dabistan, has even less of sequence or of argument, but the observations and views of an intelligent, although garrulous and somewhat credulous, Muhammadan, who flourished nearly two centuries ago, have nevertheless a peculiar value; and Capt. Troyer's careful translation has now rendered the book accessible to the English public. [Colonel Kennedy, in his valuable Researches, takes no notice of the modern reformers and he even says that the Hindu religion has remained unchanged for three thousand years (p. 192, &c.); meaning, however, it would seem, that the Unity of the Godhead is still the doctrine of Philosophy, and that Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva are still the principal divinities of Polytheism. J.D.C.] 1 Shankar Acharj was a Brahman of the south of India, and according to Professor V/ilson (As. Res., xvii. 180), he flourished during the eighth or ninth centjury but his date is doubtful, : — : and if, as is commonly said, Ramanuj was his disciple and sister's son, he perhaps lived a century or a centurj^ and a half la'ter. He is believed to have established four muths, or monasteries, or denominations, headed by the four out of his ten instructed disciples, who faithfully adhered to his views. The adherents of these four are specially regarded as 'Dandis', or, including the representatives of the six heretical schools, the (Cf. Wilson, As. Res., xvii. whole are called 'Dasnames'. 169, &c.) - Ramanuj is variously stated to have lived some time between the beginning of the eleventh and the end of the twelfth (Wilson, As. Res., xvi. 28, note.) In Central India he understood to have told his uncle that the path which he, Shankar Acharj, had chosen, was not the right one; and the nephew accordingly seceded and established the first four century. is 'suinprdaees', or congregations, in opposition to the four muths or orders of his teacher, and at the same time chose Vishnu as the most suitable type of God. Ramanuj styled his congregation that of Sri, or Lakshmi. The other three were successively founded Ijy, first, Madhav; secondly, by Vishnu Swami and his better-known follower Vallabh; and thirdly, by Nimbharak or Nimbhaditya. These, although all Vaishnavis, called their >