thought of her constantly, and deeply regretted the weakness that made him displease her. He met her casually once, in a large city, and pleaded with her to let him visit her. She told him she would let him do so, and see how things worked out. She lived in the equivalent of an apartment, on the third floor of a residential building. He promised to come. Unfortunately, "I" There lost or forgot the address she gave him, and at the last intrusion, was a lonely and frustrated man. He was sure that Lea would interpret his loss of the address as indifference on his part and another example of his instability. He was working, but was spending his idle time trying to find Lea and the children. What can be made of all this? In view of the less than idyllic circumstances, it scarcely qualifies as an escape from reality via the unconscious. Nor is it the type of life one might select to enjoy vicariously. One can only speculate, and such speculation of itself must consider concepts unacceptable to presentday science. However, the "dual but different" life activity may lend a clue to the "where" of Locale three . The most important assumption is that Locale three and Locale one (Here-Now) are not the same. This is based upon the differences in scientific development. Locale three is not more advanced, perhaps even less so. There is no time in our known history where science was at the Locale three stage. If Locale three is neither the known past nor the present, and not the probable future of Locale I, what is it? It is not a part of Locale two , where only thought is needed or used. It might be a memory, racial or otherwise, of a physical earth civilization that predates known history. It might be another earth-type world located in another part of the universe which is somehow accessible through mental manipulation. It might be an antimatter duplicate of this physical earth-world where we are the same but different, bonded together unit for unit by a force beyond our present comprehension. Doctor Leon M. Lederman, Professor of Physics at Columbia University, has stated: "Basic physics is completely consistent with the cosmological conception of a literal antiworld of stars and planets composed of atoms of antimatter, which is to say negative nuclei surrounded by positive electrons. We can now entertain the intriguing idea that these anti-worlds are populated by antipeople, whose antiscientists are perhaps even now excited by the discovery of matter'