Tempo:
INTRODUCTION. 55
force,” which “I” appears to draw from his wrists or knees as a sort of red sticky matter (part of his “energy” or “vitality” body ?). At any rate, that is what appeared to happen when on one occasion “I” lifted a bed with two people in it,* and spoke to one of them in the “direct” voice. Physically I dare not attempt to lift a small child, for I have not the strength to do it.
In Phone-voyance there seems to be a marked difference from both these forms of Clairvoyance—in fact, several differences.
Firstly, there is a physical connection with the place or house “at a distance”; secondly, I can talk through the telephone to the man “at a distance”; thirdly, the description is given fo the person “at a distance.” Whereas, of course, in long-distance Clairvoyance and Mental-body-travelling none of these things apply.
I mention this because it is a point which makes the so-called explanation, ‘‘ Telepathy,” more difficult to accept than it would be if the man were actually in the room w7¢h me.
* I have a letter from one of the individuals who was in the bed and who heard me speak in the “direct ” voice ; but I do not print the letter, as it was not checked by the signatories of
the Voucher, and therefore cannot honestly be included in this book.
force,” which “I” appears to draw from his wrists or knees as a sort of red sticky matter (part of his “energy” or “vitality” body ?). At any rate, that is what appeared to happen when on one occasion “I” lifted a bed with two people in it,* and spoke to one of them in the “direct” voice. Physically I dare not attempt to lift a small child, for I have not the strength to do it.
In Phone-voyance there seems to be a marked difference from both these forms of Clairvoyance—in fact, several differences.
Firstly, there is a physical connection with the place or house “at a distance”; secondly, I can talk through the telephone to the man “at a distance”; thirdly, the description is given fo the person “at a distance.” Whereas, of course, in long-distance Clairvoyance and Mental-body-travelling none of these things apply.
I mention this because it is a point which makes the so-called explanation, ‘‘ Telepathy,” more difficult to accept than it would be if the man were actually in the room w7¢h me.
* I have a letter from one of the individuals who was in the bed and who heard me speak in the “direct ” voice ; but I do not print the letter, as it was not checked by the signatories of
the Voucher, and therefore cannot honestly be included in this book.
©
2026
Lehal.net