Tempo:
PHONE-VOYANCE. 153
The following letter is so self-explanatory that it needs no comment from me, beyond mentioning the fact that I had heard of Mr. Lobb, but had not seen him.
(No. 44.)
Bournemouth, Oct. 28, 1906, DEAR Mr. TURVEY,
I was this morning sitting in a mutual friend’s house. He rang you up on the telephone and you replied (showing you were at home, I understand, a mile away).
After a little conversation, he told you I was in the room, and you then said you could “see a spirit friend” with me. You gave him a description of the spirit and he repeated it to me. I recognized it distinctly. This, I think, puts the so-called “explanation,” thought read- ing, entirely on one side as not covering all the facts.
Yours truly, Joun Loss,
The next incident is very peculiar in more ways than one. I must just remind the reader of the “brownish badge” that was not there at the time but was “sometimes worn” (the case of Mr, Pontifex, letter No. 41).
This time it is not only a badge, but a silver
The following letter is so self-explanatory that it needs no comment from me, beyond mentioning the fact that I had heard of Mr. Lobb, but had not seen him.
(No. 44.)
Bournemouth, Oct. 28, 1906, DEAR Mr. TURVEY,
I was this morning sitting in a mutual friend’s house. He rang you up on the telephone and you replied (showing you were at home, I understand, a mile away).
After a little conversation, he told you I was in the room, and you then said you could “see a spirit friend” with me. You gave him a description of the spirit and he repeated it to me. I recognized it distinctly. This, I think, puts the so-called “explanation,” thought read- ing, entirely on one side as not covering all the facts.
Yours truly, Joun Loss,
The next incident is very peculiar in more ways than one. I must just remind the reader of the “brownish badge” that was not there at the time but was “sometimes worn” (the case of Mr, Pontifex, letter No. 41).
This time it is not only a badge, but a silver
©
2026
Lehal.net